I worry about him,,,he can be charming, aggressive,,, he's lost a lot of weight he looks good,,,he is long waisted and that is not really obvious when he is skinny he is built just like his grandfather .. He also has the Irish curse,,, Kelly has it too, but then so does Danielle,,, drug culture the big pharma did well.. with inoculating us with drugs as good.
I think James has ADD and the drugs are self medication.
I think James is a nice person,, he just has had to take any route he knew how,, like black children he has very little education..Devin also skated through school doing nothing,,, until he was isolated. The isolation , finally, after trying everything got him on the right track,,, I wish they had done the same with James and Adam,,, both bright,, but lacking education...
We just had a big blow up in the house,,, Kelly was drunk and pissed off about yesterday,,, James has been working long hours.. and also doing drugs , he always start his cycle like this, he gets broke, ,, he can't get the drugs,,, so he gets straight or as straight as he can,,, so he works a couple of weeks , gets paid,,, then he buys drugs,,, gets fucked up, loses his job,,,no money , no drugs,, this is the cycle I see.
no girlfriend either. but what girl wants a druggie except another druggie!
He is known about town as having drug problems and deals,,,, he got angry when I told him that, but it is true...I told him an other truth, all kinds of people do drugs, but their sneaky about it., for years, he just gets some money and goes till he's broke then ...
The reason others get away with drug shit is they keep quiet about it, he's all noise and crashing into things,,, we think he resembles a Down Syndrome person when he's fucked up ,,no offense meant to Down Syndrome,, but you do have a look and he has the look when he is fucked up..
He likes this job,,,shirt tie,,, but today he came home early ,,, something to do with drugs,,,pot.He hasn't told me about it yet and I hope he is truthful
Anyway back to Kelly,,she has been drinking and I guess she is going to a shrink to find out why,,,I can tell you why,,, because she does things she is not happy doing,, being mean is one of them, especially to me...she professes love,, but actions speak louder than words,,, we spoke at the washer and she said I was a burden,, and all the neighbors hate me ,,, because I called sherrie a Kike,, that never happened. All of it was manipulated anyway by the perps...mind control is very real in my life,,,
anyway she wants both James and I to leave,, Jillian even got involved in it,,,,Im tired so I will finish the dialogue later.
I know he's fucked up but I can't see him living under a bridge but I don't know how to break his cycle ,,, maybe rehab is a good idea. I will speak to him about that.. Lots of thought,,
Oh yeah very importamt....
New Docs Raise Questions About CIA Spying Here at Home
JUNE 15, 2015 | 10:45 AM
The current debate about government surveillance has largely overlooked the CIA, possibly because we know little about the agency's activities within the United States. While the relevant legal authorities governing the CIA, including Executive Order 12333, set out the CIA's mandate, they do so in broad terms. Beyond the generalities in EO 12333 and other laws, the public has had few opportunities to examine the rules governing the CIA's activities.
But we know more today than we did a few weeks ago. In response to a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit filed by the ACLU and Yale Law School's Media Freedom and Information Access Clinic, the CIA has released a slew of documents concerning CIA surveillance under EO 12333. (The Justice Department has also recently released a set of documents related to the executive order.)
The national debate in the 1970s about the proper limits of U.S. government spying on its own citizens was, to a large extent, about the CIA. In the wake of the Watergate scandal and news stories about other illegal CIA activity, President Gerald Ford and Congress launched investigations into the full range of CIA misdeeds — from domestic spying programs and infiltration of leftist organizations to experimentation on non-consenting human subjects and attempts to assassinate foreign leaders.
Although the CIA's legal authority to spy on Americans was very narrow, these investigative committees — chaired by Sen. Frank Church, Vice President Nelson Rockefeller, and Rep. Otis Pike — discovered that the CIA had engaged in a massive domestic spying project, "Operation CHAOS," which targeted anti-war activists and political dissenters. The committee reports also revealed that, for more than 20 years, the CIA had indiscriminately intercepted and opened hundreds of thousands of Americans' letters. In addition to documenting the intelligence agencies' extensive violations of the law, the Church Committee concluded that the constitutional system of checks and balances "has not adequately controlled intelligence activities."
The Church Committee's conclusion — at core, an admonition — still resonates today. While the documents that the CIA has released are heavily redacted, raising more questions than they answer, they strongly suggest that the agency's domestic activities are extensive.
Some highlights from the documents:
- A key CIA regulation — titled "AR 2-2" — governs the conduct of the CIA's activities, which include domestic intelligence collection.
AR 2-2, which has never been publicly released before, includes rules governing a wide range of activities, including surveillance of U.S. persons, human experimentation, contracts with academic institutions, relations with journalists and staff of U.S. news media, and relations with clergy and missionaries.
Several annexes to AR 2-2 contain the agency's EO 12333 implementing procedures. For example, Annex A, "Guidance for CIA Activities Outside the United States," sets forth the procedures that apply to CIA activity directed toward U.S. citizens and permanent residents who are abroad. Much of the relevant information is redacted. Annex F, "Procedures Governing Conduct and Coordination by CIA and DEA of Narcotics Activities Abroad," is similarly redacted in key sections, including the section discussing the agencies' "Specific Agreement Concerning Electronic Surveillance."
- The documents indicate that the CIA engages in a wide array of domestic activity, often in conjunction with the FBI.
Domestically, the CIA's spying is governed by Annex B to AR 2-2, "Guidance for CIA Activities Within the United States." This document explains:
Although EO 12333, AR 2-2, and Annex B prohibit the agency from engaging in electronic surveillance within the United States, the CIA can nevertheless ask the FBI to do its bidding:
Annex B and the CIA-FBI memorandum of understanding comport with past reporting that the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court authorized the FBI to work with the CIA to collect Americans' financial records in bulk under Patriot Act Section 215.
In addition, Annex B explains that the CIA may "use a monitoring device within the United States under circumstances in which a warrant would not be required for law enforcement purposes if the CIA General Counsel concurs."
But what qualifies as a "monitoring device"? And how exactly does monitoring differ from "electronic surveillance," which the CIA is prohibited from doing domestically? We don't know. In the newly released documents, the definition of "monitoring" (as distinct from "electronic surveillance") is redacted.
The CIA also turned over several years' worth of annual reports to Congress about the agency's activities under EO 12333. These reports begin by discussing "Intelligence Activities Conducted by CIA Within the United States." This header is followed by dozens of entirely redacted pages — once again suggesting that the agency is engaged in a significant amount of intelligence activity here at home.
- The rules for the handling of Americans' information are so complex that the CIA struggled to apply them properly.
A 2002 report by the CIA inspector general, "Intelligence Activity Assessment: Compliance with Executive Order 12333: The Use of [redacted] Collection [redacted] from 1995–2000," observed "a general and widespread lack of understanding" within the CIA of the rules governing the retention and sharing of U.S. citizens' and permanent residents' information. In particular, the OIG found that few managers or other officers "could accurately state the appropriate procedures for retaining or disseminating U.S. person information," and it concluded that these rules were "not being applied consistently" by the agency.
* * *
The independent and bi-partisan Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board is currently examining the intelligence community's counterterrorism-related activities under EO 12333. Notably, one of the topics the board plans to focus on is the CIA's collection of information within the United States. We hope that, when the board eventually issues its public report about the agencies' activities under EO 12333, it sheds a little more light on what exactly the CIA is doing here at home.
RELATED STORIES
Anonymous