the maggot first responders, perps are at it again,,

the perps start around 0400 when the guy in 316 gets up to go to work, he no longer can park under my window with his sun roof which he used to set up a pulsar to hit me all night, straight shot, he saw me looking out my window at him through his sun roof as he finished up for the mornings assault. he has not parked there since, He does't want his car sabotaged. as the maggots are doing to james truck right now. his drivers side window.
they also have lost the  third apt. application I have done so I can get away from main st. harassment. someone does not want me to leave Peabody and move away, i was told I will be homeless and live under a bridge and commit suicide.that will be imposed
had a bad day at the ipswich housing authority, got there late,,, I had called twice to tell her I would be late and she knows I have transport trouble not being allowed to own a car of my own... maggots are busy,
the lock on my door was tampered with to make the slide bold easier to open so they can come in while I seep having been sleep deprived for a week before.
i'm going to write FOIAS TO ALL THREE APT, I WAS REFUSED ,,, JUST TO DOCUMENT IT

privacy

By emitting inaudible ultrasound pings as part of normal music playback, a phone can be turned into a passive sonar device, researchers from the University of Washington show in a new paper. It can track multiple individuals at an indoor precision of 8 centimeters (3 inches), and detect different types of activity by the people in its detection zone — even through barriers, all using a normal smartphone.

People with military technology background will recognize this as next-generation passive covert radar systems, radar systems which don’t transmit, but which detect objects in the sky from changes to reflection patterns from everpresent civilian transmitters such as radio and TV towers. The primary advantage of passive covert radars is that they can’t be detected, as they only contain very sensitive receivers, no transmitters. This phone research appear to be using the same kind of technology, except it is also used as a transmitter of ultrasound pings; however, it would be trivial to separate the transmitter of pings from the receiver of the reflected patterns.

“We achieve this by transforming a smartphone into an active sonar system that emits a combination of a sonar pulse and music and listens to the reflections off of humans in the environment. Our implementation, CovertBand, monitors minute changes to these reflections to track multiple people concurrently and to recognize different types of motion, leaking information about where people are in addition to what they may be doing.”

The researchers are straightforward about the privacy threat that this technology poses: “There are privacy leaks possible with today’s devices that go beyond the ability to simply record conversations in the home. For example, what if an attacker could remotely co-opt your television to track you as you move around, without you knowing? Further, what if that attacker could figure out what you were doing in addition to where you were? Could they even figure out if you were doing something with another person?”

The researchers have tested five different indoor environment and over thirty different moving individuals, and show that even under ideal conditions, the people typically could not detect the tracking.

“We evaluated CovertBand by running experiments in five homes in the Seattle area, showing that we can localize both single and multiple individuals through barriers. These tests show CovertBand can track walking subjects with a mean tracking error of 18 cm and subjects moving at a fixed position with an accuracy of 8 cm at up to 6 m in line-of-sight and 3 m through barriers.”

It’s conceivable that malicious apps with access to the speakers and microphone will be able to use this. It’s also conceivable that apps already are. Among many smartphone devices, the researchers also implemented their CovertBand demonstrator on a 42-inch SHARP television set.

big bang

I saw a photo of two universes colliding , it stuck in my head. All those suns ,planets and debris mushed up, in some cases turned to dust. Could this be a big bang? 

I had my facebook page messed with

I changed my name to Deirdre dump,,, my facebook page was messed with and so was't my Resonance page and my blog was opened when Id didn't open it, I know the local cops have been in my page for a while.I write about wha they did to me... have posted it here,,, my photos were all missing,,,the pulses that hit my windows etc,,,no evidence...

time in mind

Metaphysical Questions for Physicists about Time.

Ifphysics is solely concerned with what actually exists within physical reality then it ought not contain expressions representing things that do not exist in physical reality.

So what does it mean when a span of time is represented in physics? The only physically extant moment within any timeline is at the present marker (for there exists no past or future in present physical space1). Models utilizing timelines are therefore not strictly describing physical reality.

If the 4th dimension of Minkowski space-time is not modeling actual physical reality, then what is it modeling? If the only physically real slice of space-time is the present frame, then what is the domain within which all other frames exist? All other frames are either within past or future. Where do we find past and future existing?

One possibility jumps to mind. Past and future are routinely contemplated by the conscious mind. This is (afaict) the only domain within which these realms of time can be found. Are representations of non-present time ultimately referring to the domain of mind? Where else might they be found?

“I regard consciousness as fundamental. I regard matter as derivative from consciousness. We cannot get behind consciousness. Everything that we talk about, everything that we regard as existing, postulates consciousness.”

― Max Planck

In Einstein’s e=mc² time is represented as a rate of change (which avoids the difficulties described above). If the universe is considered to be a body of information, is it reasonable to consider the speed of light c to be processor speed? If information can travel no faster than light2 — is this not the clock-speed of the universe?

Can we get any sense of the structure of this cosmic CPU? Physical space is distributed over vast distances. Processor speed need not be accounted for by a single clock since distributed networks can achieve high rates of parallel processing when the number of processing nodes is sufficiently high. Thus it seems likely the physical universe is built upon a distributed model.

If the universe is processed by a distributed network then what are its processing nodes? Mind jumps to mind again: in the absence of any other more likely candidates — why should we not consider nodes of consciousness to be the information processors of the universe? After all, conscious minds function entirely as information processors. They also have the virtue of actually existing as a feature of physical reality.3

If earth-life were completely unique and alone in the universe then the rest of the cosmos would contain no other forms of conscious life. What are the chances of this being true? Although conclusive evidence of life elsewhere has yet to be detected, just the probabilities alone suggest life is a common feature throughout the universe. It’s perfectly reasonable to assume this universe to be populated by many islands of conscious being.

If this is the case then why are we not receiving intelligible messages from other regions of interstellar space? But wait a second— how do we know that we’re not? If lightspeed c is the rate of universal processing and the cosmic CPU is a distributed network of consciousness — can we reasonably speculate that light itself is an information stream between nodes of consciousness? Our inability to understand what light is saying doesn’t necessarily mean it isn’t saying anything.

The presence of light may not prove the presence of conscious life. But it can be seen as evidence. The light emitted by fireflies, jellyfish and electric lamps are certainly evidence of life (as is the light in your eyes). Can we be certain that stars themselves are not conscious beings?

No complete model of the universe can omit the presence of mind and consciousness. Is it possible that within the existing mathematics of physics we have already (and unwittingly) modeled some aspect of consciousness in our representations of time? Does Einstein’s c also stand for consciousness? Are light and consciousness inextricably linked phenomena? Those of us who have practiced meditation and/or studied sacred texts might be inclined to believe yes.

Taking this line of thinking as far as possible suggests some fascinating (and mindbending) possibilities. Returning to e=mc²: if c represents the distributed processing speed of all existing conscious entities within a frame, then what does this suggest about mass and energy?

Considering the universe as a whole: m represents the weight of matter within the universe. Does this imply that energy is a product of the conscious network interacting with matter?

With a little algebra we find it’s also the case that c²=e/m. What does this tell us about the nature of consciousness? Does this suggest that the conscious network consists of energy subdued by the weight of matter? Is it reasonable to suggest that all conscious beings can be thought of as energy distributed within matter?

And what of m=e/c²? Is the present mass of the universe determined by the total universal energy as distributed among its network of conscious beings?

Can we entertain the possibility that physics already implies a partially verifiable metaphysics? One which may help us to heal the brutal divisions between materialist science and ephemeral spirituality? Can we find a deeper meaning within our rationality and perhaps bring some clarity to our mysticism?

If we are to successfully bring our world together we cannot reasonably believe that whatever particular paradigm each of us presently adheres to will prevail over all others. We’re going to have to find some way for all of our paradigms to be embraced within some meta-perspective. Such an integral vision is necessary to avoid falling into our old patterns — the terrible historical nightmares of hatred, violence and environmental destruction. Everyone knows we are once again at the precipice — and that we cannot afford to revert to previous versions of human nature. Additionally, it will not be long before we all have to contend with an artificial intelligence far greater than our own. So we had better get our act together, and soon.

A good place to start this integration process is within the fields that contain the most earnest and serious thinkers. Philosophers, scientists, poets and spiritualists each have important things to say. But none so important that any might be considered the final word. After all — existence is a mystery and we are all humble and essentially ignorant creatures within the grand scheme of things.

Here’s hoping (wishfully? desperately?) that we might all admit the limitations of our perspectives and develop a new inclusive vision of reality together, while there’s still Time.

https://www.patreon.com/taijireality

Footnotes:

1 If past and future were somehow part of the physical universe there would be a confusion of events — no succession or continuity would be possible.

2 Ignoring quantum entanglement for the time being.

3 Whether or not mind is wholly an artifact of physical matter it certainly does exist as a real factor in actual present physical reality. It might therefore be said that mind is more real than past or future.

yeah someone is in my laptop

On fb they changed the picture of Diachisions house for my motif , I couldn't change it back and I found my blog open  so I quit fb . and might delete everything.  local cops ,,someone doing it. fuck you assholes.

The collapse of the American empire, Chris Hedges, youtube video is good.

I heard on oe of the news emails that Trump had 81 christian evangelicals  for dinner in the whit emus and this is not ad,,, nor is it breaking church and state,,, but in other ways he is, betsy devos is in position, for education  prayer in school , christian evangelical prayer i school, I believe the reason the peadophilia is coming out so wrong in the CC church is because the Christianevalgelicals want to do what eh protestant did tp the CC in the UK,, they basically almost wiped them out..I think that is what is going to be done here ... The CC church will be erased.